menu

Mockoon

Mockoon's official community. Get help, discuss new features.

Channels
Chat
view-forward
# All channels
view-forward
# General
view-forward
# Announcements
view-forward
# Bugs
view-forward
# Features
view-forward
# Help
view-forward
Team
Show previous messages

December 5, 2019 at 8:39pm
I know it's a hassle and I am really sorry. This system has been develop at the very beginning of Mockoon and I realize now that it is completely unusable.
  • reply
  • like
v1.7.0 is my top priority and will be out in some days. I will try to make it compatible with older exports (by auto migrating the data, not checking the version or the checksum anymore, etc)
  • reply
  • like

January 20, 2020 at 2:43pm
Hi. Found Mockoon today and thought that it is exactly what I needed. Tested it with my proccess and ran into the same issue: https://github.com/mockoon/mockoon/issues/229 This is very annoying bug which makes it imposible for me to use Mockoon. I wish you could fix it very soon. Thank you!
Edited
  • reply
  • like

January 20, 2020 at 8:49pm
Hi , I tested and indeed got a weird JSON parse error on Mockoon's side when calling an automatically built endpoint (even with proxy mode disabled). But I am not sure if this is the same bug as the one described in the issue. Could you please post here or on the issue (better) a way to reproduce it step by step with sample data if possible. Thank you!
  • reply
  • like

January 24, 2020 at 11:56am
Hi! I uploaded a video to this isssue which shows the problem. Can I help with anything else?
  • reply
  • like
I saw, thank you! I just didn't have time to work on Mockoon the last days. I will try to have a look this weekend.
  • reply
  • like
Thank you!
  • reply
  • like

February 4, 2020 at 1:32pm
Hi there, shall I open a feature request for this ? What do you think ?

Using Rules to test against JSON empty arrays

thumbsup
0
message-simple
5
  • reply
  • like

February 4, 2020 at 8:29pm
of course you can :)
  • reply
  • like
Please note that there is already a LOT on the roadmap and it's a side project. So it does not go as fast as I would like!
  • reply
  • like

February 5, 2020 at 7:27am
I know Guillaume, I know, no worries ;) I might help with a PR, but still can't promise anything. What could be the best way to do this ? Explore Object-path (eventually PR there) ? custom ?
  • reply
  • like
I think object path can returns an array where applicable. Question is more : how to represent an array in the rule input field (string) . I would like to avoid using eval() of course. A solution would be to create a DSL with very basic syntax
  • reply
  • like