Spectrum is now read-only. Learn more about the decision in our official announcement.


A network of designers and developers making the best podcasts, blogs, and resources for designers and developers.


Redid my Personal Website

June 27, 2017 at 6:38am

Redid my Personal Website

June 27, 2017 at 6:38am
Hi Guys! I just redid my personal website and would love to get some feedback! Check it out here,

June 27, 2017 at 3:57pm
Congrats! Is there anything in particular you're looking for feedback on? The case studies, the visuals, the layout?
Without knowing the answer to your question yet, a couple things jumped out to me:
1. The case study links have a nice animation in/out, but the way it's implemented breaks the browser forward/back functionality. This means that there doesn't seem to be a way to link directly to a case study and once you're in a case study you can't click back to return, swipe back to return (if on mobile) - the only way to go back is to hit the 'x'.
2. The mouse scroll hint on the home page is gesturing in the reverse direction for me, since i have the default macOS scroll inversion on ;)
3. The hover animations on the case study cards are pretty cool and visually interesting, but were a bit disorienting at first and made it harder to click in to view the case studies. One way to help this would be to turn that off, but if you really like the animations maybe you could make the whole card clickable to view the case study?
Anyways, I'll wait on more context from your side - overall it's looking really nice. I didn't dig in too deep to the case studies yet though, so my feedback is a bit surface level right now.

June 28, 2017 at 8:08am
Sorry for no context! I basically am looking for overall feedback in terms of a hiring perspective for freelance/full time positions.
Regarding the hover animation. I'm personally a big fan and took me a while to get them to work. So what I'm considering is to make the whole block clickable and ditch the view case button. I know that you didn't read the case studies, but do you think the content was structured well?

June 28, 2017 at 3:42pm
Sounds good re: the case study blocks being clickable :)
Re: case studies - i'll dig into the Lisn one if that works, and maybe some of this is relevant to the other case studies. Overall it feels like a good start - you opened with a story that described why this was important for you to build and how the idea came up. That's useful context. But between your second and third paragraphs we skip a massive part of your work and process:
"We started out with a basic MVP of the product which we launched in April 2016. Our idea was to just have a Chat and Library where you can revisit tracks that were sent to you by friends."
One of the things that feels useful before there is to explain why you made the decisions you made in building the MVP. Why did you only start with Chat and Library? Why was it important to revisit tracks that were sent to you, versus a more ephemeral or feed model? Did you talk to other people who wanted something like this? What are competitors in the space doing (Spotify, SoundCloud, Apple Music, etc) - or better: what are they not doing that made your thing so awesome. (Note: if this was just a side project, I think that'd be good to call out? The way the case study read was that it was a company you had started, but maybe that's not right?)
Then your next paragraph:
"We got a lot of feedback from the MVP and started thinking about what a finished product would look like. Initially, we thought that the music experience could be split into three parts, Discovery, Archiving and Re-visiting. With that in mind, we created 3 basic tabs in the app, one for chat, one for the library and the last for a solo player in the app to revisit music you've already shared with friends. "
Agin we've jumped over a huge piece of the design process :) How did you go from MVP to finished product? What was the feedback on the MVP? What did you learn when you saw people using it? What were clear areas to improve? Why did it become important to split the app into the three sections you listed?
Show more messages