I have a few concerns about my dangerfile results. I know i could write from 0 a script to collect the data I need and report it back to my PR, but still would like to use the power of Danger.
The results preview via an HTML comment is a very smart solution, but still would like to customise what I am able to see on other services https://github.com/danger/danger/issues/701
If I solely use markdown() comments, I can customise the output, but the summary is still going to be wrong. Apart from this, there is a default inline, spacing etc. I can't really template, nor I know a method to fully customise the output. Say I have many optional fields and special formats.
Also " Generated by 🚫 dangerJS " comments will always appear? Don't want to seem selfish, but it's the only self-signed tool I am using. Maybe there is a super easy way to opt-out.
I'd not be adverse to accepting a PR with another messaging primitive function that allows more control like you ask, like raw or something. It'd need in include the danger-id which is referenced in a comment in the issue body, and I think I'd still want it to keep the "by Danger" signature.